Structura · Videos
Each video follows one fund from the facts to a ranked set of structures: venture, buyout, hedge, real estate and credit, then eligibility, costs and economics. They run about two minutes each.
1:52
Video 1
Designing a fund is a search problem: fix one side and another breaks. See how Structura starts from the facts, proposes a structure, tests it against tax, Advisers Act, Investment Company Act, Securities Act, ERISA and state law, and ranks the alternatives, priced and modeled.
Watch on YouTube →
1:43
Video 2
U.S. taxable, tax-exempt and non-U.S. investors in C-corporation startups. Structura proposes one Delaware fund, explains why unlevered C-corp stock produces neither UBTI nor ECI, and shows the one fact that would change the answer.
Watch on YouTube →
1:57
Video 3
Pass-through buyout deals create UBTI and ECI. See where Structura places the blocker, why a U.S. corporation is used instead of an offshore one, and how a parallel fund, a blocker feeder and an offshore feeder compare.
Watch on YouTube →
2:00
Video 4
An open-end fund trading stocks, bonds and derivatives. Structura proposes a master-feeder, explains the trading safe harbor, shows when a single Delaware fund would win instead, and compares the mini-master.
Watch on YouTube →
2:06
Video 5
A U.S. income real estate fund with tax-exempt and non-U.S. investors. A private REIT with an operating partnership, the 100-shareholder test, FIRPTA and the domestically controlled REIT, compared with a plain REIT and a corporate blocker.
Watch on YouTube →
2:08
Video 6
Whether lending is a U.S. trade or business is a question of fact, so the user states the facts. On those facts, Structura proposes season-and-sell, explains the discipline it depends on, and compares a leveraged blocker.
Watch on YouTube →
1:59
Video 7
Qualified clients and a qualified purchaser in a 3(c)(7) draft. Structura flags the conflict, explains the two fixes, a single 3(c)(1) fund or parallel 3(c)(1) and 3(c)(7) funds, and ranks both.
Watch on YouTube →
1:43
Video 8
Using the ERISA 25% test: each finding leads with the conclusion, cites the primary authority, and says how settled the law is and when it was last reviewed. You can override a finding with a note. You make the decisions.
Watch on YouTube →
2:18
Video 9
One-time and annual costs borne by the fund, line by line with ranges, with sponsor costs kept apart. Switch the rate basis and every legal line is repriced.
Watch on YouTube →
2:03
Video 10
Net multiple and IRR, gross to net step by step, five scenarios, 10,000 simulated markets, who bears the tax, and what the structure saves over the simplest feasible one. A model of the structure, not a forecast.
Watch on YouTube →